On 29 October, Singapore’s Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) issued a directive to local banks urging them to identify, assess, and manage environmental risks linked to haze, pollution, and deforestation, according to a Xinhua news release. The guidance follows a series of haze episodes across the region and the National Environment Agency’s (NEA) recent enforcement actions under the Transboundary Haze Pollution Act.
MAS noted that banks should integrate environmental risk assessment into their existing credit evaluation frameworks. The agency emphasised that reliable data on haze emissions and deforestation activities—provided by the NEA—must be considered when evaluating customers whose operations could exacerbate air‑quality issues. By using these data inputs, banks can pinpoint “haze‑linked exposure points” and gauge the likelihood of environmental violations.
Environmental risk, in this context, refers to the potential for a financial institution’s activities to create or worsen environmental degradation that can impact human health and ecosystem services. Assessing such risk involves analysing both the direct carbon footprint of customer operations and the indirect effects of supply‑chain activities that might contribute to haze events.
MAS reiterated that when a customer has a clear history of breaching environmental laws, the bank must take stronger action. This includes setting exposure limits, tightening financing terms, or even terminating the relationship. “Clear breaches of environmental laws would warrant stronger measures, including limiting exposures or exiting the relationship,” MAS said.
MAS said.”
In practice, banks are instructed to engage with customers to understand the scope of their environmental responsibilities. The engagement process should identify measures in place to prevent, detect, and stop forest fires that fuel haze, as well as safeguards to monitor compliance with national and international environmental standards.
The guidance also calls for banks to impose conditions on credit facilities that are tied to high‑risk sectors, such as palm oil production and industrial waste disposal. By linking sanction criteria to measurable environmental performance metrics—like reductions in high‑emission activities—financiers can align business growth with sustainability goals.
MAS’s directive aligns with broader policy trends in the region. The Transboundary Haze Pollution Act, passed in 2015, grants the NEA the authority to issue Preventive Measure Notices (PMNs) to companies that may be contributing to haze. Banks are therefore expected to monitor PMN listings and adjust exposure accordingly. PMNs require companies to take corrective actions and face penalties for non‑compliance, creating a direct financial incentive for businesses to improve their environmental practices.
Historically, the financial sector in Asia has viewed environmental risk as a “non‑financial” liability. MAS’s move represents a shift toward integrating greening metrics within quantitative risk models, a practice increasingly adopted by global regulators. By incorporating NEA data into risk analytics, banks can now calculate the probability of haze‑related disruptions and their potential impact on credit quality.
From a data perspective, the NEA provides near real‑time monitoring of airborne particulate matter, the primary pollutant associated with haze. Banks can access CPI dashboards that map particulate concentrations across the Singaporean and regional landscape. Coupling these environmental indicators with customer exposure data allows for dynamic stress‑testing of loan portfolios under varying haze scenarios.
MAS also highlighted the role of “engagement” in risk mitigation. Financial institutions are encouraged to hold regular dialogue sessions with clients to clarify expectations on environmental management. If a customer demonstrates inadequate fire‑prevention protocols, MAS recommends that banks revise lending conditions or reduce exposure amount to mitigate potential losses related to environmental disruption.
Going forward, MAS plans to develop a formal reporting framework whereby banks will disclose the extent of environmental risk mitigation activities undertaken each year. This public disclosure is intended to foster transparency and encourage corporate stewardship across the supply chain.
Although not explicitly part of the Xinhua release, other sources indicate that MAS intends to enforce stricter penalties when clients repeatedly breach environmental codes. This approach is consistent with measures governments are adopting worldwide to hold corporations accountable for atmospheric pollution.
Finally, the directive from MAS coincides with regional calls to establish a joint task force to address cross‑border haze, involving Singapore and Indonesia’s ministries. Such cooperation could enhance data sharing and harmonise enforcement, providing banks with a more robust set of tools to assess and manage haze‑linked ecological risks.
In sum, MAS’s guidance signals a decisive step toward embedding environmental risk into Singapore’s financial risk management paradigm. By drawing on NEA data and linking lending terms to environmental performance, banks can reduce the likelihood of haze‑induced defaults while supporting cleaner, more resilient supply chains.
