Skip to main content
Quanta Report
PoliticsUnited States

Trump’s Plan to Activate the ‘God Squad’ and Its Implications for Environmental Law

President Trump’s recent executive orders aim to convene the ‘God Squad,’ a powerful committee that can override the Endangered Species Act, raising concerns about species conservation.

By Catrin EinhornSource: nytimes.com1 min read
Trump’s Plan to Activate the ‘God Squad’ and Its Implications for Environmental Law
Image via nytimes.com

In brief

President Trump has initiated the process to activate the rarely used 'God Squad,' a committee that can bypass the Endangered Species Act under specific conditions. This move has sparked discussions about the balance between economic development and environmental protection.

In a striking move following his inauguration, President Trump has indicated intentions to utilize the ‘God Squad,’ an official committee that holds the authority to override the Endangered Species Act, potentially endangering various species in favor of development projects. The term ‘God Squad’ encapsulates the gravity of the committee's influence, signifying its role in determining the fate of imperiled wildlife. This committee, formally known as the Endangered Species Committee, comprises senior officials including the interior secretary and heads of other key departments like agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency. With the ability to cast votes on significant federal actions that may threaten endangered species, a majority can permit projects to move forward despite ecological ramifications.Experts caution that while Trump has expressed his intent to convene this committee, there are strict procedural hurdles that must be navigated. Since its inception in 1978, the God Squad has rarely been convened, with only three rulings to date: two projects were approved, and one was denied. The rarity of its use highlights the contentious nature of balancing developmental ambitions with conservation responsibilities.As these discussions unfold, the implications for biodiversity and environmental policies remain a point of critical focus among legal experts, conservationists, and the public alike. Advocates for wildlife conservation are likely to mobilize efforts against any measures that could jeopardize endangered species under the guise of economic interests.

Topics

More on this story